Could not find who is accountablefor the decisions it makes without a human
of 25
Found the limit only in a footnote or annexurewhat it is allowed to decide on its own
of 25
Would send it backif it came to their board today
TimingHas it happened yet? If it has, the evidence belongs in the paper.
NatureIs it a fact, or an authority? Facts are evidenced. Authority is allocated.
Decision pointWhat is being decided today? At approval the bar is what exists now.
On those three tests, a funding approval requires3 demonstrated3 referencednothing asserted, nothing missing
What the paper says
Audit and Risk Committee · evidence review
Project Compass
Funding approval · 25 pages + 20 annexure pages
The Committee reviews every paper recommending an AI-enabled system against six questions, and against the level of evidence the Committee requires for each at this kind of decision. This sheet records what this paper reaches. It is attached for the Board’s information and does not replace the paper.
What this board could rely on
0 of 3
Bars show the level reachedâ–˛ marks the level required at this decision
Bars show the level reachedâ–˛ marks the level required at this decision
Method developed as part of doctoral research at the University of Technology Sydney.
The Committee’s required level is set in advance for this kind of decision. A grade records what stands behind management’s answer, not whether the system is sound. Whether the gaps are acceptable is the Board’s decision.
Method developed as part of doctoral research at the University of Technology Sydney.